QualiCell® Human Kupffer Cells

Cat.No.: CSC-C9039J

Species: Human

Source: Liver

Cell Type: Kupffer

  • Specification
  • Background
  • Scientific Data
  • Q & A
  • Customer Review
Cat.No.
CSC-C9039J
Description
QualiCell® Human Kupffer Cells are isolated from adult human livers. Each vial contains a minimum of one million viable cells. These easy-to-use cells provide a convenient way to produce hepatocyte and Kupffer cell co-cultures for the study of various hepatic functions. These cells typically have high viabilities and in vivo-like expression levels.
Species
Human
Source
Liver
Cell Type
Kupffer
Disease
Normal
Storage
Ship in dry ice and store in liquid nitrogen.
Citation Guidance
If you use this products in your scientific publication, it should be cited in the publication as: Creative Bioarray cat no. If your paper has been published, please click here to submit the PubMed ID of your paper to get a coupon.

Human Kupffer cells (KCs), first identified and named by Karl Wilhelm von Kupffer in 1876, are specialized macrophages located within the liver and form a part of the mononuclear phagocyte system. They constitute 30-35% of non-parenchymal liver cells and account for 80-90% of all macrophages in the human body. Typically, they reside in the lumens of liver sinusoids, adhering to the endothelium. KCs originate from their own macrophage lineage, derived from the yolk sac rather than hematopoietic stem cells. Based on CD206 expression levels, KCs can be categorized into two subpopulations: the predominant CD206loESAM- (KC1) and the minor CD206hiESAM+ (KC2), each serving distinct functions under normal physiological conditions.

Kupffer cells possess self-renewal capability, with an average lifespan of 3-4 days, regulated by apoptosis. They can migrate to portal areas and liver lymph nodes before being phagocytosed by adjacent KCs. Morphologically, KCs are amoeboid, with nuclei that are oval or indented. Their cell surfaces are equipped with microvilli, pseudopodia, and lamellipodia extending in various directions. These structures are involved in phagocytosis and pinocytosis, clearing foreign debris and particles such as pathogens, immune complexes, liposomes, lipid microspheres, tumor cells, endotoxins, and various other particulates.

In addition to their phagocytic role, KCs produce inflammatory cytokines, reactive oxygen species, TNF-α, and proteases. During liver infections or injury, the inflammatory response driven by KCs prevents infection and mitigates host damage. However, in certain liver pathologies, such as NAFLD/NASH, KC activation leads to uncontrolled inflammation within the liver. Therefore, developing strategies to normalize or inhibit, but not entirely eliminate, KC activity in the liver is crucial for managing chronic inflammatory liver diseases.

Localization of KCs in the liver.Fig. 1. Schematic representation of the liver micro-anatomical structure and Kupffer cells localization in lower (a) and higher magnification (b) (Woltman AM., Boonstra A., 2014).

HoxLDL-Stimulated Kupffer Cells Demonstrate Reduced Phagocytic Capacity, Increased Neutrophil Recruitment and NETosis Induction

The liver is the central organ for cholesterol synthesis and homeostasis, with studies indicating that oxidized low-density lipoprotein (OxLDL) plays a significant role in hepatic inflammation. But the precise mechanisms remain unclear. Maretti-Mira et al. found that the oxidation state of LDL influences gene transcription in liver M2-like macrophages, including genes involved in cholesterol metabolism, oxidative stress response, and innate inflammation. Additionally, both M2-like macrophages and Kupffer cells (KCs) undergo M4-like polarization. Hepatic macrophage populations are dynamic, with the M1 phenotype being a major source of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines, the M2 phenotype contributing to inflammation resolution and wound healing, and the M4 phenotype exhibiting reduced phagocytic capacity and increased cholesterol efflux. This study provides a link between LDL oxidation and altered peripheral and hepatic macrophage function.

Phagocytosis is a key function of macrophages. The phagocytic capacity of Kupffer cells stimulated with native LDL (nLDL) or high OxLDL was assessed (Fig. 1A and B). The results showed that at 1 hour and 10 minutes, human KCs treated with high OxLDL exhibited a significant 60% reduction in phagocytic capacity compared to unstimulated KCs. Compared to nLDL treatment, high OxLDL significantly decreased phagocytosis by 39% at 2 hours. The inhibition of phagocytosis by high OxLDL was maintained for the entire duration of the study. In contrast, the phagocytic capacities of unstimulated and nLDL-stimulated KCs were comparable. Additionally, cytokine and chemokine secretion are another hallmark function of macrophages. Consequently, the neutrophil chemotactic activity of treated KCs was also assessed. Conditioned media from high OxLDL-treated KCs (KC-Hox) significantly recruited more neutrophils than media from PBS- or nLDL-stimulated KCs. The differences were significant at 8 hours, peaking at 12 hours. No significant difference was observed between KC-PBS and KC-nLDL recruitment (Fig. 2A). The effects on neutrophil extracellular trap formation (NETosis) revealed that KC-Hox triggered NET formation at 20 minutes, achieving a maximum effect at 1 hour and 10 minutes, and lasting for almost 2 hours (Fig. 2B and C). KC-PBS and KC-nLDL showed much lower NET formation induction and comparable results. These findings suggest that Kupffer cells exposed to HoxLDL transform into an M4-like phenotype and acquire new functionalities that may influence the progression of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

HoxLDL reduces the phagocytic activity of human Kupffer cells.Fig. 1. HoxLDL inhibits human Kupffer cells' phagocytic activity (Maretti-Mira, A. C., Golden-Mason, L., et al., 2021).

Polarization to M4 phenotype induced by HoxLDL boosts neutrophil recruitment and NETosis.Fig. 2. HoxLDL-derived M4 polarization enhances neutrophil recruitment and NETosis (Maretti-Mira, A. C., Golden-Mason, L., et al., 2021).

The Variances in Cytokine Production Profiles from Non- or Activated THP-1, Kupffer Cell and Human Blood Derived Primary Macrophages Following Exposure to Either Alcohol or A Panel of Engineered Nanomaterials

The portfolio of cytokines is key to the function of macrophages as sentries of the innate immune system as well as being critical for the transition from innate to adaptive immunity. The changes in cytokine production levels (IL1-β, IL6, IL10 and TNF-α) as a consequence of nanomaterial (NM) and ethanol exposure was assessed in activated and non-activated THP-1 (immortalized monocyte-like cell line), primary human Kupffer cells and human primary peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs).

From the data, it is evident that the cytokine profile of the three macrophage models were markedly and significantly different from each other (Fig. 3 and 4). The data demonstrated that the PBMCs secreted the largest quantities of IL1-β, IL6 and TNF-α following NM or ethanol exposure (Fig. 3 and 4A-B). The same pattern was observed for both non-activated and activated macrophages. Overall, the data demonstrated only small variations in the individual cytokine responses between activated and non-activated macrophages exposed to the same xenobiotic. The control levels of cytokine expression in the non-activated models were expectedly lower as compared for the activated counterparts. As suspected, the IL10 secretion levels was highest for the KCs. However, small but significant levels of the anti-inflammatory IL10 cytokine were produced by the PMBC population following NM and ethanol treatment (Fig. 3C-D). The IL10 response was entirely absent from THP-1 (immortalized monocyte-like cell line) cells. In fact, generally speaking, the cytokine secretion for the THP-1 was relatively low, although statistically significant was reached for IL1β and TNF-α for the non- or activated THP-1 cells. Interestingly, no distinctly clear differences in the cytokine section patterns between the different NMs was apparent.

Secretion of IL1β (A and B) and IL6 (C and D) from both activated and non-activated THP-1 cells, KC, and PBMCs upon exposure to nanomaterials or ethanol.Fig. 3. IL1β (A and B) and IL6 (C and D) secretion from activated and non-activated THP-1, KC and PBMCs exposed to NMs or ethanol (Kermanizadeh, A., Brown, D. M., et al., 2019).

Secretion of TNF-α (A and B) and IL10 (C and D) from both activated and non-activated THP-1 cells, KC, and PBMCs upon exposure to nanomaterials or ethanol.Fig. 4. TNF-α (A and B) and IL10 (C and D) secretion from activated and non-activated THP-1, KC and PBMCs exposed to NMs or ethanol (Kermanizadeh, A., Brown, D. M., et al., 2019).

Ask a Question

Write your own review

For research use only. Not for any other purpose.