Our Promise to You

Guaranteed product quality, expert customer support

Our Promise to You

ONLINE INQUIRY

Farage

Cat.No.: CSC-C9100W

Species: Human

Source: lymph node

Morphology: lymphoblast

  • Specification
  • Background
  • Scientific Data
  • Q & A
  • Customer Review
Cat.No.
CSC-C9100W
Description
The Farage cell line was adapted to culture in 1990 from a lymph node biopsy of a patient with diffuse large cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (DLCL).
Species
Human
Source
lymph node
Recommended Medium
SuperCult® Farage medium
Morphology
lymphoblast
Storage and Shipping
liquid nitrogen vapor phase
Citation Guidance
If you use this products in your scientific publication, it should be cited in the publication as: Creative Bioarray cat no. If your paper has been published, please click here to submit the PubMed ID of your paper to get a coupon.

The Farage cell line was adapted to cell culture in 1990. It was derived from a lymph node biopsy taken from a patient diagnosed with diffuse large cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (DLCL). This aggressive form of lymphoma is characterized by the proliferation of large, abnormal B lymphocytes that have lost their normal regulatory mechanisms.

The Farage cell line has also been used to create the Farage-Luc2 cell line, which can serve as a target cancer cell for in vitro killing assays by CD20 CAR-T cells, and is expected to work for CD19 CAR-T cells as well. The Farage-Luc2 cells express high levels of CD20. This makes the cell line an ideal model for in vitro studies of CD19-specific CAR-T cells due to its excellent signal/background ratio and stable luciferase expression.

The establishment of the Farage cell line provided researchers with a valuable tool for studying the biology and potential treatment approaches for this type of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. As a cell line derived directly from a patient sample, the Farage cells maintain many of the key molecular and phenotypic features of the original tumor cells. This allows investigators to use the Farage model to better understand the genetic alterations, signaling pathways, and other factors that drive the uncontrolled growth and spread of DLCL.

Lack of Ig Polypeptide Chain Production in Farage Cells

To see whether Farage cells produce μ and Ig κ chains, the cells were metabolically labeled with 35S-methionine and the cell lysates were immune precipitated using anti-μ and aIIti-κ sera. Daudi and DG-75 B-lymphomas known to express surface IgM (κ) served as positive controls. Fig. 1 shows that in contrast to Daudi, radioactively labeled μ and κ chains could not be detected in Farage cytoplasmic cell lysates even following a long exposure time. In Daudi cells (Fig. 1) and DG-75 (not shown), large amounts of labeled μ chains were detected by either anti-μ or anti-κ reagents, indicating that both cell types produced μ and κ polypeptide chains. On the other hand, labeled κ was not detected at all in DG-75, and was detected at a low quantity in Daudi cells, where it was present in immune precipitates formed with anti-κ and not when the anti-μ agent was used (Fig. 1). Our results show that the κ light chains in Daudi, (and even more so in DG75 cells), are poorly labeled probably due to lack of the amino acid methionine in their κ light chains.

Because of the κ-chain labeling problem, immunoblots were done on the cytoplasmic lysates of DG-75 and Farage cells using enhanced chemiluminescence. Fig. 1B shows that whereas DG-75 contained both μ and κ polypeptide chains, no Ig chains could be detected in Farage cells. A band of a somewhat higher molecular size than the μ chain appeared in Farage cell lysates. However, a similar band is also present in the K562 negative control. To find out whether Ig chains were abnormally directed to the perinuclear or nuclear compartments of Farage cells, the nuclear pellet formed following NP40 cell lysis was lysed by SDS and deoxycholate and then immunoprecipitated with various antisera. Whereas μ chains could be detected in the "nuclear lysates" of Daudi cells by either anti-μ or anti-κ sera, no labeled Ig chains were detected in similar lysates made from Farage cells (not shown). Examination of the culture medium of Daudi, DG75, and Farage cells showed that labeled IgM was secreted by DG-75 but not by Farage or Daudi cells (not shown). The latter finding fits the classification of DG-75 as a sporadic (American) type BL, representing a more advanced stage of the B-cell differentiation pathway, as compared to Daudi cells classified as an endemic (African) type BL.

Treatment of OPM-2 cells with CSP led to a significant increase in adhesion of the cells to HUVECs (P < .05).Fig. 1 Farage cells do not synthesize Ig-polypeptide chains. (Baruch M, et al., 1996)

Generation of SLAMF1-Deficient Farage Cells

SLAMF1 was highly expressed in Farage cells, an EBV-positive B cell lymphoma cell line. To generate SLAMF1-deficient Farage cells, two sgRNAs targeting exon 3 of SLAMF1 were designed by using CRISPR/Cas9 technology (Fig. 2A). The two sgRNAs coupled with Cas9 expression vectors were transfected, and three cell lines named 3C, 8C, and 4E were obtained by serial dilution and mutational analysis (Fig. 2B). As shown in Fig. 2B, two bands were observed in 4E after PCR amplification, indicating a deletion of exon 3 in one allele (Fig. 2B). Sub-bands appeared after cleavage of heteroduplex in 3C, 8C and 4E, indicating the presence of at least one indel mutation (Fig. 2B). Whether the expression level of SLAMF1 was decreased at the cell surface was tested by using FACS analysis. SLAMF1 was almost negative in the three cell lines compared with SLAMF1 wild-type Farage cells (Fig. 2C). This result was further confirmed by western blot analysis with the anti-human SLAMF1 antibody, which was a different clone than that used for FACS analysis. SLAMF1 was not detected or remarkably decreased in mutant cell lines, whereas LMP1 had no discernable change between SLAMF1 wild-type and mutant cells (Fig. 2D).

(a, b) The OPM-2 or RPMI8226 cells were cocultured with MSCs in a 6-well transwell microplate with or without dexamethasone (10 μM). After 48 hours, cell viability was determined using the MTT assay. Besides, (c-f) cell number and colony formation assays were also determined on the OPM-2 and RPMI8226 cells. Mock indicates that the cells were transfected with a vector.Fig. 2 SLAMF1-deficient Farage cells were cloned by using CRISPR/Cas9. (Yoon H, et al., 2020)

What are the challenges in establishing tumor cell lines?

Challenges in establishing tumor cell lines include contamination issues, genetic instability, and the potential for the loss of original tumor characteristics during in vitro culturing.

When and how was the Farage cell line established?

The Farage cell line was established in 1990 from a lymph node biopsy of a patient diagnosed with diffuse large cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (DLCL).

What is significant about the genetic makeup of the Farage cell line?

The Farage cell line has been used to create the Farage-Luc2 cell line, which expresses high levels of CD20, making it an ideal model for in vitro studies of CD19-specific CAR-T cells due to its excellent signal/background ratio and stable luciferase expression.

What is the doubling time of the Farage cell line?

The Farage cell line has a doubling time of approximately 48 hours.

Ask a Question

Average Rating: 4.7    |    3 Scientist has reviewed this product

Intuitive protocols

Even researchers with limited experience in cell culture techniques can work with these cells successfully, thanks to the intuitive protocols provided.

02 Dec 2023


Ease of use

After sales services

Value for money


High-quality products

The Farage cells we purchased from Creative Bioarray were of quality and have been instrumental in our lymphoma research.

21 May 2024


Ease of use

After sales services

Value for money


Excellent growth and performance

The Farage cells from Creative Bioarray have consistently shown excellent growth and performance.

17 Apr 2024


Ease of use

After sales services

Value for money


Write your own review

For research use only. Not for any other purpose.